For the moment, please see the technical tab for a description of this taxon.
name
Amanita sp-QUE01
author
Tulloss
name status
cryptonomen temporarium
GenBank nos.
Due to delays in data processing at GenBank, some accession numbers may lead to dead pages.
These pages will eventually be made live, so try again later.
This mushroom is known from a single collection with very limited annotation. Utilizing the little information that has resulted from a brief investigation, the most applicable existing name seemed to RET to be A. calyptrata var. albescens a poorly known taxon originally described from Saratoga Co., New York, U. S. A. A sporograph comparison of the present entity with that Peck's A. calyptrata var. albescens is provided below:
A sporograph comparison with another pallid, NE U.S. species of sect. Caesareae is provided below.
Sometimes, individual specimens of A. spreta can be very pale to white. A sporograph comparison of the present taxon to A. spreta is provided here.
A preliminary molecular study (unpublished) of the specimen on which this "taxon" is based shows that the specimen is phylogenetically closest to A. murrilliana in a sample of nearly 60 taxa of sect. Caesareae; however, due to the known morphological difference (spore width) and some phylogenetic differences (ca. 8 bp limited to ITS1 or 1.52% of the single nrITS sequence obtained), RET hesitates to place the present collection in A. murrilliana at present.
citations
—R. E. Tulloss
editors
RET
Information to support the viewer in reading the content of "technical" tabs
can be found here.
name
Amanita sp-QUE01
name status
cryptonomen temporarium
author
Tulloss
name
Amanita sp-QUE01
name
Amanita sp-QUE01
Spore data for collections provisionally identified as: Amanita sp-QUE01 Tulloss
Each spore data set is intended to comprise a set of measurements from a single specimen made by a single observer;
and explanations prepared for this site talk about specimen-observer pairs associated with each data set.
Combining more data into a single data set is non-optimal because it obscures observer differences
(which may be valuable for instructional purposes, for example) and may obscure instances in which
a single collection inadvertently contains a mixture of taxa.