name | Amanita neocaesariensis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
name status | nomen provisorum | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
english name | "New Jersey Cylindric-Spored Amidella" | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
etymology | "Novo Caesarea" is an old Latin name for New Jersey. The compound word for referring to something as "from New Jersey" is "neocaesariensis." | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
GenBank nos. |
Due to delays in data processing at GenBank, some accession numbers may lead to unreleased (pending) pages.
These pages will eventually be made live, so try again later.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
lamella edge tissue | sterile. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
basidiospores | RET: [60/3/3] (10.4-) 12.1 - 14.3 (-15.3) × (3.5-) 4.0 - 5.0 (-5.3) μm, (L = 12.7 - 13.4 μm; L' = 13.0 μm; W = 4.1 - 4.7 μm; W' = 4.4 μm; Q = (1.96-) 2.65 - 3.45 (-3.71); Q = 2.76 - 3.14: Q' = 2.98), | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ecology | New Jersey: In deep sandy soil of Quercus-Pinus rigida barrens. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
material examined |
big>U.S.A.:
NEW JERSEY: Burlington Co., Chatsworth,
Franklin Parker Preserve | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
discussion |
The present species was briefly called "A. sp-sagittaria03" in the Roosevelt herbarium data base. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
citations | —R. E. Tulloss | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
editors | RET | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Information to support the viewer in reading the content of "technical" tabs can be found here.
name | Amanita neocaesariensis |
name status | nomen provisorum |
author | Tulloss, I. Safonov & K. W. Hughes |
english name | "New Jersey Cylindric-Spored Amidella" |
images | |
photo |
Igor Savonoff - (1) Franklin Parker Preserve,
Chatsworth, Burlington County, New Jersey,
U.S.A. [Full size images can be found at
mushroomobserver.org
#108464.] (2-4) (RET 561-4) [Note: Untrimmed and unedited images may be found at mushroomobserver.org/108464] (5) (RET 561-3) [Note: Untrimmed and unedited images may be found at mushroomobserver.org/108463] |
Each spore data set is intended to comprise a set of measurements from a single specimen made by a single observer; and explanations prepared for this site talk about specimen-observer pairs associated with each data set. Combining more data into a single data set is non-optimal because it obscures observer differences (which may be valuable for instructional purposes, for example) and may obscure instances in which a single collection inadvertently contains a mixture of taxa.