name | Amanita craseoderma |
name status | nomen acceptum |
author | Bas |
english name | "Complex-Skinned Ringless Amanita" |
intro |
This description is taken from the original description of Bas (1978). |
cap |
The cap of A. craseoderma is about 60 mm wide, plano-convex with a subumbilicate center, with a broad, sulcate-striate margin. The cap is very dark brownish gray with pale marginal grooves. The volva is present as very few, small dark gray-brown, irregularly shaped, wart-like remnants. |
gills |
The gills are free, fairly crowded, and very pale grayish. The short gills are very rare and (obliquely?) truncate. |
stem |
The stem is 110 - 7 mm, subcylindrical, exannulate, fuscidulous gray, and subglabrous to glabrous. The flesh is relatively thin and very fragile. The volva forms one nearly complete, narrow, dark gray-brown, subfloccose belt about 6 mm above the stem base. |
spores |
The spores measure 7.5 - 9.0 × 7.0 - 8.0 µm, and are subglobose and inamyloid. Clamps are absent at bases of basidia. |
discussion |
The word "craseoderma" means "blended" or "mixed skin." This and the proposed English name for the taxon refer to the diversity of cell forms that appear in caps' skins in A. craseoderma. Amanita craseoderma was first described from material collected in primary forest (Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil) by Dr. Rolf Singer. The form of the volva suggests a relationship to such taxa as A. ceciliae (Berk. & Broome) Bas and A. sororcula Tulloss, Ovrebo & Halling. Since the symbionts of these species do not occur naturally in Amazonia, comparison to African taxa such as A. calopus Beeli is also appropriate.—R. E. Tulloss & L. Possiel |
brief editors | RET |
name | Amanita craseoderma | ||||||||
author | Bas. 1978. Persoonia 10: 20, figs. 32-35. | ||||||||
name status | nomen acceptum | ||||||||
english name | "Complex-Skinned Ringless Amanita" | ||||||||
MycoBank nos. | 308547 | ||||||||
GenBank nos. |
Due to delays in data processing at GenBank, some accession numbers may lead to unreleased (pending) pages.
These pages will eventually be made live, so try again later.
| ||||||||
holotypes | INPA; isotype, L | ||||||||
intro |
The following text may make multiple use of each data field. The field may contain magenta text presenting data from a type study and/or revision of other original material cited in the protolog of the present taxon. Macroscopic descriptions in magenta are a combination of data from the protolog and additional observations made on the exiccata during revision of the cited original material. The same field may also contain black text, which is data from a revision of the present taxon (including non-type material and/or material not cited in the protolog). Paragraphs of black text will be labeled if further subdivision of this text is appropriate. Olive text indicates a specimen that has not been thoroughly examined (for example, for microscopic details) and marks other places in the text where data is missing or uncertain. The following material is derived from the protolog of the present species. | ||||||||
basidiospores | from protolog: [10/1/1] 7.5 - 9 × 7 - 8 μm, (Q = 1.05 - 1.15; Q = 1.10), hyaline, colorless, thin-walled, smooth, inamyloid, subglobose; apiculus sublateral and cylindric to truncate-conic (all per figure); contents monoguttulate ("oil drop" type); color in deposit not recorded. | ||||||||
ecology | from protolog: On yellow soil hylaea in primary terra firme forest, with Lecidithaceae, Fabaceae, and other dicotyledonous trees, few Palmae. | ||||||||
material examined | from protolog: BRAZIL: AMAZONAS— 30 km N of Manaus, 30.ix.1977 R. Singer B10160 (holotype, INPA; isotype, L). | ||||||||
citations | —R. E. Tulloss | ||||||||
editors | RET | ||||||||
Information to support the viewer in reading the content of "technical" tabs can be found here.
name | Amanita craseoderma |
bottom links | [ Keys & Checklists ] |
name | Amanita craseoderma |
bottom links | [ Keys & Checklists ] |
Each spore data set is intended to comprise a set of measurements from a single specimen made by a single observer; and explanations prepared for this site talk about specimen-observer pairs associated with each data set. Combining more data into a single data set is non-optimal because it obscures observer differences (which may be valuable for instructional purposes, for example) and may obscure instances in which a single collection inadvertently contains a mixture of taxa.