About Limacella

Limacella illinita - Tlaxcala, Mexico - RETLimacella glischra - Chiricahua Mtns., Arizona, USA - RETLimacella illinita - Tlaxcala, Mexico - RETLimacella glischra - Chiricahua Mtns., Arizona, USA - RETLimacella illinita - Tlaxcala, Mexico - RETLimacella glischra - Chiricahua Mtns., Arizona, USA - RETLimacella illinita - Tlaxcala, Mexico - RETLimacella glischra - Chiricahua Mtns., Arizona, USA - RET
Limacella cf. illinita sensu auct. amer (first image) and L. glischra (Morgan) Murrill
Photographs by RET.


Species of the genus Limacella Earle (Earle 1909) are strongly differentiated from the genus Amanita by their mode of basidiome (fruiting body) development (ontogeny).  Whereas the species of Amanita share the unique form of ontogeny that is called “schizohymenial” (see About Amanita), basidiome development in Limacella is generally like that of all other terrestrial (ground-growing) Agaricales in exhibiting the following stages:
  • growth of a minute, vertically oriented, rudimentary stipe (stem)
  • initiation of pileus (cap) growth at the top of the rudimentary stipe [In cross-section, the rudimentary pileus expands at first by extending its edge outward, then downward, and then into a self-enclosing spiral.]
  • initiation of lamella (gill) growth on the underside of the developing cap (the inside of the cap-edge spiral).
In other words, for the species that have been investigated, the lamellae of a Limacella grow into empty space from the under surface of the developing pileus.  As a result, unlike the species of Amanita, limacellas have a fertile edge on their lamellae—basidia appear on the faces and on the edge of a Limacella lamella.
A fertile gill edge of a specimen belonging to the Amanitaceae is demonstration that the organism in question produced this gill on a fruiting body that did not arise through schizohymenial ontogeny—the gill edge did not have to be separated mechanically from a partial veil or a stipe of an Amanita basidiome.  Hence, when the gill edge of a specimen of the Amanitaceae is fertile, that specimen is a Limacella, not an Amanita.
On the cap of a Limacella, the analog of the universal veil of Amanita is a glutinous (slimy) matrix supported by tightly packed, vertically oriented hyphae (sometimes with distinctive tip cells) that arise not from a pileipellis (cuticle or cap skin), but from a dense layer in the uppermost part of the pileus context (cap flesh).  Indeed, as in most taxa of Amanita [sect. Lepidella] subsect. Vittadiniae there is no pileipellis present in Limacella.  In the literature, a reference to a "pileipellis" in Limacella is a reference to the vertically oriented hyphae and associated slime or gluten that are the analog of the universal veil in Amanita.  In the pages of this site, we will call this structure the gluten layer of the pileus or the "universal veil analog" in descriptions of species of Limacella.  The vertically oriented hyphae in the gluten layer will be called the "gluten retaining hyphae."

What do we know about the gluten layer in Limacella?  According to the work of Reijnders (1979), it develops in at least two stages:
In the first stage, very narrow hyphae grow vertically from the outer surface (eventually, the upper surface) of the developing pileus.  These hyphae soon begin to gelatinize and collapse creating a slimy covering for the immature cap.

A second set of hyphae (of larger diameter than the first group) develops from the tissue just below the bases of the first set of vertically aligned hyphae.  The second set of hyphae is also vertically aligned and very tightly packed and carry the previously created slime upward on their closely packed tips.

The tip (terminal) cells of these hyphae take on shapes that fall approximately into three groups that (given present knowledge) are considered as a possible foundation for a hypothetical division of the genus Limacella into three groups which are given the rank of sections on this site (until we learn a reason to change this rank).  These sections will be discussed further on the page titled Sections of Limacella.
With regard to the “slimy partial veil” seen in some species of Limacella, this structure is thought to be a remnant of the development of the universal veil.
Since the young cap has its edges curled under (putting part of the cap surface near to the surface of the developing stipe) some hyphae form wispy (spiderweb-like or cortina-like) connections between the cap and the stipe.  These hyphae gelatinize and create a slimy partial-veil-like structure that will include some hyphae.  When the cap unfurls and breaks the tenuous connection with the stipe, small tufts of broken hyphae covered with slime may be left encircling a narrow region on the upper stipe.  The resulting ring of material looks like a partial veil in Amanita and may be protective of the maturing lamellae for a short time; but its origin and development differ from the origin and development of the partial veil in the schizohymenial genus Amanita.
A membranous partial veil is present in some species of Limacella—those few comprising Limacella section Amanitellae

The state of understanding of Limacella is behind that of the genus Amanita.  Methodology and terminology have not been as thoroughly developed in the case of Limacella as they have for Amanita.  The last attempt at revision for North America was published in 1945—sixty-five years before this sentence was drafted.  As a consequence, revisions of all type collections and many more recent, well-documented collections will have to be made to gain a better, worldwide grasp of the diversity, taxonomy, and systematics of this genus.

Part of the reason for the lack of understanding is lack of subject matter experts using modern methologies.  Lack of expertise may be due, at least in part, to the very small number of collections that exist to support research.  This site lists about 50 taxa or probable taxa in Lepidella, and there are a few pairs or triplets of "taxa or probable taxa" that probably consist of material of a single taxon.

There is a very significant role to be played by disciplined collectors who collect carefully, annotate thoroughly, and photograph well.  So few collections of Limacella are reported each year (e.g., on mushroomobserver.org or blogs of mushrooming groups) that it is a shame not to have more of them documented more thoroughly and dried well for deposit in a working herbarium that is accessible to specialists.  The way to make progress certainly must involve soliciting quality collections from as broad an audience of potential collectors as possible.

The type species of Limacella is Agaricus delicatus Fr. : Fr. (1821).

To start exploring Limacella with an alphabetized directory of the taxa included on this site, go here.

The images on this page are the work of RET and represent taxa from the Chiricahua Mountains of SE Arizona, U.S.A.

[NB: Images and well-documented dried collections of Limacella are sought by both editors.]